PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150212 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 20 '19 at 13:27 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ AGILITY3 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 83 80 78 77 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
112GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 103 102 103 102 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
|||
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
80GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 100 98 98 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 129 129 129 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.8%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |