Lenovo Lenovo C200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo Lenovo C200 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101122
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '19 at 01:22
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Memory 25.4 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 13.4 12% 15.3 Pts	4-Core 22.3 8-Core 23.6 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 21.6 1% 21.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0011LVM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 21 20 21 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 9 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 20.7 10% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.9 4.8 5.5 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 4 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.1 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 26 Write 23.2 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 20.1 31% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.4 155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 5.1 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Read 25.4 Write 2 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 4.6 10% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.64% Terrible	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 283 14% 283 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo Lenovo C200

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)