Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '19 at 11:12
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 72.5 1-Core 146 2-Core 332 95% 184 Pts	4-Core 662 8-Core 1,316 117% 989 Pts	64-Core 1,311 81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 46.8 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 38.7 38% 39.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 36.4 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53 30,265 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 302 278 277 277 262 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 733 Write 827 Mixed 757 SusWrite 317 148% 658 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 50 177% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 698 DQ Write 683 DQ Mixed 589 470% 657 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 141%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 179 181 183 185 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 190 Write 169 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 181 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.6 12% 4.57 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 11 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 23%
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115 11,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 139GB free Firmware: Q0926B SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 438 453 449 445 448 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 446 Mixed 410 SusWrite 427 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 49.4 173% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 262 212% 298 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB 4,229 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.4% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 15.5 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	186x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	166x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	150x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	114x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	112x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	103x

Value: 110% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16