PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160325 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Oct 27 '19 at 18:01 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90%
Excellent
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 233 186 192 180 173 MB/s
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
50GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 277 217 216 205 205 MB/s
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 158 158 159 155 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 95 95 95 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 34TB
15.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 195 183 176 182 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,545x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 841x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 595x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 990x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 887x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 469x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $972 |