Acer Aspire M3-581TG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire M3-581TG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA50_HX
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120512
Uptime17.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 14:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2467M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30% Below average
1-Core 58
2-Core 98.2
38% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 132
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 133
9% 133 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 067D) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 14
Parallax 4.6
2% 8.37 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 9.1
1% 6.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 118 111 92 104 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 399
Write 299
Mixed 326
SusWrite 131
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 22.2
73% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 159
146% 224 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 6GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire M3-581TG Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3-581TG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback