Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 132
57% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.101.0.0
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 4.47
2% 4.24 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.96
3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 301 312 327 277 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 394
Write 333
Mixed 255
SusWrite 302
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 13.8
94% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 85.3
97% 164 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 86%
WD WD2500AVJS-63B6A0 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 76 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 77
Write 77.2
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 77.6
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
Generic- Multiple Reader 64GB
59GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 24.6
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
207% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 25%
Maxone USB 3.0 320GB
246GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 88 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 89.8
Write 89.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89.6
107% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 0.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback