Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '19 at 00:43
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3680-$180 6,658 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 97.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 210 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 665 65% 535 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 465 1,390 User benchmarks, average bench 13% EVGA(3842 1467) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 810 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 23.8 Parallax 17.1 13% 18.9 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 18.7 15% 19 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 184 152 153 154 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 372 Write 227 Mixed 264 SusWrite 168 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 42.2 138% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 211 158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 115%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 56GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 99 99 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 97.9 Write 96.1 Mixed 68 SusWrite 99.6 67% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 68%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 53GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 43 43 43 43 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 153 Write 53.5 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 39 97% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.7 86% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17.6 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 14.4 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 49.4 81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	404x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	148x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	342x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	330x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16