Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 16:14
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 145
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 246
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 259
16% 259 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 64.5
56% 66.7 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 68
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 148 155 156 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 251
Write 145
Mixed 156
SusWrite 141
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 24.2
87% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 146
95% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
200GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 118 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
61GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 64.7
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 60.3
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 55%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB
278GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 94
Write 87.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 66.3
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
148GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 23.6
32% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.2 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 27
Write 17.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.4
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-UD2H Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback