RM DESKTOP 320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM DESKTOP 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 00:35
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 167
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 381
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 44.4
45% 49.9 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 47.7
38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 144 141 153 136 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 364
Write 160
Mixed 157
SusWrite 141
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 15.4
56% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 104
93% 146 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 73%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
86GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 42 69 68 73 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 77.7
Write 82
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 63
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.3 9.6 9.3 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 4
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 9.2
17% 15 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2
166% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP 320 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: RM DESKTOP 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $481
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback