Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 65.5 2-Core 122 59% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 209 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 GS 41 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 342A) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	0.27% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.65 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 57 85 82 112 76 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.2% Very poor	Read 31 Write 13.3 Mixed 123 SusWrite 73.4 14% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 13.1 4K Mixed 6.3 36% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 65.3 DQ Mixed 4.3 14% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $144

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16