HP EliteBook 8460w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8460w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 161C
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 03:50
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 141
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 206
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M3900
HP(103C 3671) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.67 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 2.65
2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 63 66 83 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.3
Write 22.4
SusWrite 63.5
22% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8460w Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8460w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback