| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H310M-HG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190320 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 03 '19 at 19:23 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
91.5%
Outstanding
|
87% 153 Pts
|
73% 575 Pts
|
43% 699 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847E) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
24% 30.7 fps
|
28% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HP S700 500GB-$60
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 405 410 414 412 413 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
98% 435 MB/s
|
136% 47.7 MB/s
|
93% 180 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 127 129 123 128 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
85% 117 MB/s
|
132% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
46.1%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
63% 63.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310M-HG4 Builds (Compare 139 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 37x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 34x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GTX 1060 6GBNvidiaBench 56%, 56,417 samples | 13x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $199 |