Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	17.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1804 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 03:49
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 144 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 437 45% 363 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 36BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 64.6 Parallax 55.7 44% 58.1 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 54.4 Splatting 52.9 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zotac ZTSSD-A4P-120G 120GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 48 53 53 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 364 Write 99.8 Mixed 135 SusWrite 54.4 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 3.6 66% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 52.4 DQ Mixed 9.8 25% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 67%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145 5,462 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 315GB free Firmware: DE12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 97 100 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 35.5 Write 13 Mixed 33 SusWrite 98.4 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 866GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 141 141 140 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 141 Write 132 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 141 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GXH EWB4GB681CA3-16IC F3-2133C9-8GXH 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16