HP 255 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AE
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181214
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 149
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 209
34% 242 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84AE) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.62
5% 8.41 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 13.7
7% 8.18 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 199 204 204 203 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 485
Write 416
Mixed 305
SusWrite 208
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 33.1
116% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 207
157% 212 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback