Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-XA (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '19 at 23:27
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 964 86% 726 Pts	64-Core 1,308 81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 95%

Graphics Cards	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 75A4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7063 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Lighting 5.87 Reflection 99 Parallax 7.78 5% 37.6 fps	Gravity 6.6 Splatting 15 10% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 75A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Lighting 87.3 Reflection 103 Parallax 92.2 71% 94.2 fps	Gravity 91.9 Splatting 88.7 80% 90.3 fps
Poor: 52% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4 10,188 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 548 184 561 413 474 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,735 Write 1,074 Mixed 633 SusWrite 507 218% 987 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 46.7 162% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 771 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 294 253% 393 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 293%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 456GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1785 1765 1521 1458 1388 1361 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 1,966 Write 1,531 Mixed 1,483 SusWrite 1,546 366% 1,631 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 67.1 218% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 629 DQ Mixed 750 554% 731 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 410%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.9 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 2.7 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 4.6 9% 8.95 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.8% Above average	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.6 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.7 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	72x
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples	10x

GPU
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	48x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	34x

SSD
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $4Bench 228%, 10,188 samples	40x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	38x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	8x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	7x

Value: 617% - Outstanding

Total price: $4

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16