HP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR

Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8591
Memory	60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 08:48
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 91.4 1-Core 147 2-Core 301 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 1,165 102% 867 Pts	64-Core 1,468 91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% HP(103C 372B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.45 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 159 Parallax 154 133% 159 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 146 Splatting 105 114% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 477GB free Firmware: EXA73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 884 601 604 601 603 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,283 Write 1,625 Mixed 1,255 SusWrite 843 334% 1,502 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 75.5 246% 83.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,182 DQ Write 948 DQ Mixed 1,092 810% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 869GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 100 130 132 39 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 132 Write 74.9 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 98.3 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 25.7 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 TWR

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	126x
Core i5-9500IntelBench 87%, 9,059 samples	35x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	67x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	47x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	35x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	20x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)WD $300Bench 263%, 4,259 samples	9x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK M378A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 64GBSamsungBench 79%, 31 samples	28x
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	13x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $584

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16