Asus EX-H310M-V3

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H310M-V3 (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 18:05
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4900-$42 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 201 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	2.29% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 3.87 3% 4.19 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 0.09 1% 1.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.29% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB 3,097 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 94 96 95 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 510 Write 410 Mixed 382 SusWrite 113 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 42.3 146% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 122 128% 214 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.4 4.6 3.9 3.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 4.2 16% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.9 149% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Dial 32GB 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 5599 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.5 2.6 4.4 3.3 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 25.1 Write 5.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.7 11% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.1 208% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 1x4GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H310M-V3 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H310M-V3

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	48x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	36x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	17x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	14x

SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	15x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	7x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16