PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150526 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 09 '19 at 21:20 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1850-$32
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.2
|
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 125 123 124 127 100 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 233x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 121x |
Core i5-4440Intel $132Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 109x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 174x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 116x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $313 |