| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDS (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180120 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 10 '19 at 05:31 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
65% 115 Pts
|
43% 318 Pts
|
21% 341 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8569) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
26% 29.5 fps
|
24% 30.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 366 324 319 314 316 MB/s
|
96.7%
Outstanding
|
85% 377 MB/s
|
140% 47.2 MB/s
|
253% 342 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
465GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 124 128 128 128 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
346GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 104 110 110 111 MB/s
|
61.5%
Good
|
70% 95.1 MB/s
|
88% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB-$41
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.1%
Good
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
54% 19.1 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 588 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 123x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 101x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $200 |