PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-S2PV |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171107 |
Uptime | 8.7 Days |
Run Date | Nov 10 '19 at 22:49 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 95 100 82 85 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 800e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 MB/s
|
3.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 99x |
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 90x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 65x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |