PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell DM051 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0WG261 |
Memory | 0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20070108 |
Uptime | 28.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '19 at 00:15 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 82% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Radeon HD 4670
PwrHis(1787 2009) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
|
5.09%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 175 183 177 195 205 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
56GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 13 11 12 12 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples | 8x |
Pentium D 2.66GHzIntel $129Bench 26%, 394 samples | 2x |
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $22 |