| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130124 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 12 '19 at 14:57 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 68% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
66.5%
Good
|
67% 110 Pts
|
31% 232 Pts
|
15% 238 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
26% 30.5 fps
|
26% 31.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 77 76 76 81 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
30% 41.4 MB/s
|
43% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.4%
Above average
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
66% 61 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-PLUS Builds (Compare 19 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 5x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 4x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 5x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 17% - Very poor | Total price: $15 |