| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 8.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '19 at 16:11 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
58% 93.4 Pts
|
37% 297 Pts
|
24% 384 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
|
21.6%
Poor
|
20% 26.9 fps
|
24% 29.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 183 97 28 145 30 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
55% 248 MB/s
|
67% 22.9 MB/s
|
96% 141 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
136GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 93 92 92 92 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
70% 94.9 MB/s
|
123% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
48.8%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |