PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Casper D300 / D200 / N100 / NB MASAUSTU BILGISAYAR (all builds) |
Motherboard | CASPER H110M4 C43 003 |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170929 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 13 '19 at 20:58 |
Run Duration | 104 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
493GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 93 104 99 103 MB/s
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7500Intel $88Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 27x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 16x |
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 8x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $147 |