Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core L310 325 User benchmarks, average bench 25% S1G1/BGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 38.7 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 22.8 19% 25.9 Pts	4-Core 29.1 8-Core 30.7 4% 29.9 Pts	64-Core 33.2 2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 029E) 336MB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.722.1.2000 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.34 0% 0.5 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.78 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.r SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 130 139 73 74 150 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 202 Write 172 Mixed 170 SusWrite 118 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 16 50% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 60.8 DQ Mixed 59.1 47% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon X2 Dual Core L310AMDBench 25%, 325 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	5x

SSD
C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GBCrucialBench 46%, 1,591 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16