Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime16.7 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 16:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 69
2-Core 120
55% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 247
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 62.4
55% 66.6 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 55.5
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 343 381 373 394 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 368
Write 424
Mixed 307
SusWrite 361
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 28.7
90% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 229
184% 259 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 358 389 409 378 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 291
Mixed 318
SusWrite 351
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 49.4
161% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 196
164% 239 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
804GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 169 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 152
Mixed 109
SusWrite 169
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback