Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH P67  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 02:13
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 523
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 59.6
50% 63.1 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 53.2
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 143 143 144 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 332
Write 203
Mixed 231
SusWrite 138
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 29.4
94% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 103
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
455GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 99 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 116
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 100
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.3
412% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52%
Great: 94%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
756GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 45 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 81
Write 92.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 45.8
84% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
227GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 45 46 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 72.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 45.9
73% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 106
Write 84
Mixed 46
SusWrite 45.2
88% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
386GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 76
Write 77.7
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 44.9
73% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-433.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback