MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 03:32
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 142
2-Core 311
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 960
96% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 116
Parallax 225
109% 158 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 127
Splatting 159
112% 133 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 852 853 848 858 859 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,703
Write 2,627
Mixed 1,874
SusWrite 879
452% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 97.4
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,248
936% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 318%
Great: 355%
CHN 25SATAA3 240 240GB
71GB free
Firmware: Q1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 119 49 82 59 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 508
Write 409
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 132
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 17.4
66% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 1.2
40% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 89%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
155GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 398 399 400 400 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,532
Write 1,884
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 574
364% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 90.2
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1,172
878% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 282%
Great: 302%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
65GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 214 203 213 198 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 682
Write 675
Mixed 342
SusWrite 197
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 43.4
187% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 394
346% 519 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 122%
Great: 144%
MONSTER USB 2.0 4GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.7 8.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 8
10% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 41.7
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 42
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback