Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 70%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 155
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 303
30% 248 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 16.8
10% 16.4 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 20.3
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 44 39 4.1 102 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 324
Write 267
Mixed 234
SusWrite 75
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 13.5
42% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 26.1
38% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
715GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 170 174 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 160
Mixed 100
SusWrite 173
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
557GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 93 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 71.8
Write 91.7
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 93
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback