Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 167 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 426 48% 374 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 176B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.27% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 12 8% 11 fps	MRender 9.24 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 13.5 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.27% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0922A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 443 Write 373 Mixed 10.3 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
Intel SSDMAEXC024G3H 24GB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 12GB free Firmware: 9CV10379 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 92 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 134 Write 94 Mixed 102 SusWrite 91 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 19.2 64% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 78.7 60% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 38%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free Firmware: GH2OA440 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 77 71 78 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 72 Write 78.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 73.3 43% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 0D9B Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	492x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	296x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	19x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16