Lenovo 20EGS09300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EGS09300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGS09300
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '16 at 19:59
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 552
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 6.28
3% 5.54 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.83
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 472
Write 279
Mixed 309
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 12.5
79% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 12.2
18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback