Gigabyte GA-A75M-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A75M-D2H  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 01:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 93.3
47% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 182
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 226E) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 15
10% 13.6 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 14.5
11% 13 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 337 327 330 326 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 423
Write 406
Mixed 316
SusWrite 331
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 39.2
115% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 55.3
46% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 172 178 188 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 98
Write 165
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 179
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
236% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 22.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 36.5
23% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 26.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 36.4
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A75M-D2H Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A75M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback