Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 31.4 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 77.2 29% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 84.6 8-Core 82.4 11% 83.5 Pts	64-Core 78.9 5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 1 1% 1.02 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2.26 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT24L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 133 157 170 164 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 331 Write 323 Mixed 252 SusWrite 172 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 32.3 103% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 109 85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 246 16% 246 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16