| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 860-011no (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 2B4B |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161206 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '19 at 00:12 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
81% 144 Pts
|
61% 449 Pts
|
29% 468 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Device(1B0A 90F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.42
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.9%
Poor
|
20% 28.7 fps
|
29% 35.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 135 133 129 127 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
44% 199 MB/s
|
80% 29.4 MB/s
|
159% 237 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
251GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 106 105 105 106 MB/s
|
68.1%
Good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
142% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.2%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
48% 16.6 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 860-011no Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 860-011no
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 1x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $224 |