Asrock Z77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77M  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 16:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 549
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 41.8
32% 37.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.6
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 138 126 116 105 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 483
Write 453
Mixed 308
SusWrite 151
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 40.1
136% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 348
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 134
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
598GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 31.7
Write 26
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 26.8
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 855D 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77M Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback