HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 725
77% 615 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 688 688 684 685 686 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 743
Mixed 762
SusWrite 690
174% 773 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 53.9
179% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 713
555% 760 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 168%
Great: 182%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
98GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 108 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 108
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
498GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 44 52 49 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 97.7
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 47.7
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
51GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 43.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 66.5
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
504GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 86
Write 88
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 84.7
109% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback