Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 191 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 514 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 450 261 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Apple(106B 0167) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 17 13% 17.8 fps	MRender 20.3 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 23.5 16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXS6AA0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,324 Write 1,328 Mixed 849 260% 1,167 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 29.1 90% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,192 DQ Write 422 DQ Mixed 695 543% 770 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 224%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 66GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 385 384 386 385 375 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 385 Write 387 Mixed 364 SusWrite 382 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 22.9 72% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 149 110% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 23.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

RAM
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	27x
0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 707 samples	6x
Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GBVMwareBench 69%, 2,863 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16