HP p7-1074

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP p7-1074 (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AB1
Memory	10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '16 at 08:39
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165 5,709 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 43.4 2-Core 84.7 46% 69 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 218 24% 189 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.9 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.19 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 15 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 48 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 778397678	60.7% Good	Read 262 Write 186 Mixed 202 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 26 111% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 60.8 61% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 124%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 870GB free Firmware: 06.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 169 4333 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 968 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31421 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 958 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 54 370278422 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 191 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 776 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.2% Good	Read 115 Write 111 Mixed 108 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.34 110% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 75%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3.5TB free, PID ab1e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 23.9 Write 25.1 Mixed 8.16 23% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.14 4K Write 2.67 4K Mixed 0.55 114% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical p7-1074 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1074

CPU
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	1x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

SSD
S3 1T02 1TBSandiskBench 102%, 12,047 samples	1x

RAM
64D0JKHHJ Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 2 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 32%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $469

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16