Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 06:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 48%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 164
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 371
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 38.9
2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1851) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 5.66
5% 7.74 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 4.26
4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 200 218 262 264 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 367
Write 321
Mixed 303
SusWrite 258
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 9.4
57% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 33.2
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 110%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
838GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 60 76 86 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 34.3
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 72.5
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P24HC8T1-BBJS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.8
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback