Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.7% Very good
1-Core 120
2-Core 218
81% 169 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 566
64% 490 Pts
64-Core 645
43% 645 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3615
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 188
Reflection 177
Parallax 185
49% 183 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 174
Splatting 147
50% 160 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 625 619 662 631 581 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,768
Mixed 1278
SusWrite 646
299% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71
234% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,087
824% 1,110 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 228%
Great: 289%
Adata SD600Q 960GB
820GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 356 355 359 357 353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 388
Write 325
Mixed 297
SusWrite 355
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 13.9
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 67.7
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 19.7
21% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
69.9% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 21.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback