Asrock Z87M Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 17:49
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 89.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 408 56% 418 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Lighting 73.6 Reflection 74 Parallax 66.5 60% 71.4 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 72.4 58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 184 215 119 83 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 348 Write 332 Mixed 292 SusWrite 139 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 48.6 157% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 45.4 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 63.6 54% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 651GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 188 215 119 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 353 Write 336 Mixed 267 SusWrite 140 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 41.4 134% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 51 47% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 121%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 54 Write 56 Mixed 38 37% 49.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 49 48 48 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 44.5 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 46.1 32% 43.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 33%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 80GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 53 54 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 50.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 53.3 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 44%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 264GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 53 54 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 100 Write 92.7 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 53.4 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 79%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 316GB free, PID 6012 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 42 41 41 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 22.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 40.5 44% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 924 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.6% Average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 14.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Extreme4 - $200

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	56x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	41x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	39x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
SN520 NVMe WDC 128GBPCBench 120%, 1,325 samples	9x

RAM
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	20x
CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,109 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $415

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16