Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '19 at 12:50
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 113 54% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 273 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 83.5 50% 71.1 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 52 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 405 Write 321 Mixed 130 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 33.5 113% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 106 108% 175 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 477GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 109 109 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 104 Write 99 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 106 63% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 396GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 186 187 186 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 164 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 182 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905403-172.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/4G 9905403-172.A00LF 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.7% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16