Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 81 34% 54.9 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 390 44% 342 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 91 93 90 90 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 433 Write 412 Mixed 368 SusWrite 126 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 28.9 98% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 355 262% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 420GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 171 171 170 171 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 128 Write 112 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 170 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 0215 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2187, 2187 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	808x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	566x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	560x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $750

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16