Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181102
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 14:48
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 138 2-Core 258 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 922 86% 714 Pts	64-Core 1,398 86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 92.3 56% 76.1 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 70 Splatting 58.1 54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM21.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 215 220 228 223 222 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 421 Write 416 Mixed 319 SusWrite 228 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 20.4 106% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 156 149% 229 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 97%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 179GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 329 329 331 330 330 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 408 Write 326 Mixed 293 SusWrite 330 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 33.4 130% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 180 155% 225 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 97%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 140GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 612 298 297 296 297 294 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,518 Write 1,295 Mixed 563 SusWrite 349 207% 931 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 41 177% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 1,041 DQ Write 1,168 DQ Mixed 780 677% 996 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 236%
WD My Passport 1TB 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 60.5 113% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 22 25 22 23 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 115 Write 36 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 23 68% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 136% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 30%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 22 26 24 25 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 157 Write 54.5 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 38.1 90% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.7 154% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 2,707 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.7% Good	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 18.6 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 11.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	493x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $62Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16