PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Lenovo 10120 (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131118 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 18 '19 at 16:03 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 342 351 359 353 359 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 0467 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 KHX1600C10D3/4G 0467 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 143x |
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 88x |
Core i5-4430Intel $124Bench 65%, 24,837 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 42x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 37x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $215 |