Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 22:15
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 700
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 23
21% 22.5 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 19.4
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1062 825 805 803 786 776 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 2,242
Mixed 1,880
SusWrite 843
417% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 77.5
252% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 794
573% 746 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 262%
Great: 355%
C400-MTFDDAK512MAM 512GB
77GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 246 241 224 240 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 499
Write 260
Mixed 296
SusWrite 229
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 26.8
117% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 50.8
83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
823GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 130 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 129
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback