DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 166
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 414
47% 369 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
EVGA(3842 2621) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 3.22
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 2.52
3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CMFSSD-128GBG2D 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 22 27 39 24 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 200
Write 42.5
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 31
20% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 8.5
40% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 4.1
DQ Mixed 6.5
6% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 34%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
744GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.8
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 103
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 82 115 118 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 84
Write 108
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 98.3
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 65%
WD 15EARS External 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 28.1
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback