DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7 960-$265
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.5% Above average
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 161
58% 122 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 400
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 397
27% 397 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
EVGA(3842 2621) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 10.3
3% 10.8 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 5.8
3% 8.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair CMFSSD-128GBG2D 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM19C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 22 27 39 24 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 200
Write 42.5
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 31
20% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 8.5
40% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 4.1
DQ Mixed 6.5
6% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 34%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
744GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 102 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.8
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 103
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 82 115 118 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 84
Write 108
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 98.3
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 67%
WD 15EARS External 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 28.1
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 1,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback