| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell XPS 8900 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0XJ8C4 |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190523 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 20 '19 at 08:07 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.3%
Very good
|
76% 133 Pts
|
58% 467 Pts
|
37% 592 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
|
9.05%
Terrible
|
9% 10.8 fps
|
10% 11.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 109 116 122 122 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
79% 109 MB/s
|
138% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 37 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
23.6%
Poor
|
27% 37 MB/s
|
138% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.6%
Good
|
70% 24.4 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,769 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell XPS 8900
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 2,110x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 463x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 171x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples | 507x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 345x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 236x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $369 |