Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 04:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K-$280
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
103% 218 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 794
90% 688 Pts
64-Core 793
53% 793 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$340
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11021.1000
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.1% Average
Lighting 211
Reflection 164
Parallax 283
55% 219 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 168
Splatting 181
47% 160 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 50%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$142
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 436 434 445 450 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 438
Mixed 422
SusWrite 442
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.7
178% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 135%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$90
293GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 243 171 108 173 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 464
Write 436
Mixed 371
SusWrite 217
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 38.7
143% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 202
148% 184 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$15
118GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 82 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
48% Average
Read 85.7
Write 78.7
Mixed 55
SusWrite 81.5
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
46.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 5,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,095
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $645SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback