| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1600x1200x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160108 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 28 '19 at 14:18 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.3%
Above average
|
51% 79.1 Pts
|
26% 208 Pts
|
16% 263 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
|
36.2%
Below average
|
37% 49.6 fps
|
34% 42.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 98 146 111 141 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
79% 109 MB/s
|
132% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.4%
Below average
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
54% 74.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $162 |